You may or may not have heard the news:
All Military-Style Weapons and High-Capacity Magazines have been declared 100% legal, specifically for We The People (as opposed to Standing Army Military i.e. US Military & National Guard). All. Not some: ALL.
This was very clearly and very specifically declared nearly 250 years ago (details below), in spite of every lie and/or misrepresentation you may have been presented with in the past by people who want to see you and your family enslaved.
Correct historical context makes it extremely clear that the Founders very specifically differentiated between a militia of the people and any military which may be established and/or controlled by government. The Founders very specifically referred to all forces such as the US Military and National Guards as a “standing army(s)”, with just a couple of the endless examples being Alexander Hamilton’s specific statement regarding an armed people being the best security against any standing army of the government (below, keep reading), and James Madison’s statement:
“A standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen.”
SO I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU
Is breaking the law a proper response to someone else breaking the law?
Of course not you’d surely say, but that is precisely what all Gun Control advocates seek to do as they attempt to claim that violent crimes (which are already illegal, gun or no gun) when committed by an extremely minuscule percentage of the population, somehow justifies their own wholesale breaking of The Law, specifically The Second Amendment of The Law of this Land.
The Constitution is The Law of this Land. It is not, “the law”. It is The Law. The word “infringe” means “to limit”. The 2nd Amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. It does NOT say, “shall not be infringed unless…”. It does not say, “shall not be infringed…unless it’s a little at a time”. Nor does it say, “shall not be infringed unless it is too black and ‘scary looking’”.
A WELL REGULATED MILITIA
The Founders did not fight and win a war against government regulation because they meant to assign the regulation of the means of war to government (and a more absurd argument than that has perhaps never existed). In the correct historical context, “well regulated Militia” equals specifically We The People, specifically keeping and bearing arms in a manner which is well (and fully) equipped, well maintained, well trained, well disciplined, on the ready, and so on as such.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Finally for now, here is another thing the 2nd Amendment does NOT say:
“Shall not be infringed (limited) unless another person commits murder (which is already illegal), in which case we are free to break The Law in any way we see fit including the full and direct violation of the 2nd Amendment of The Law of This Land, even though the Founders of this Nation specifically insisted that a well-equipped and well-maintained militia comprised specifically of the people as specifically opposed to a specific standing army or armies which has been or is specifically established and/or run specifically by government as opposed to specifically the people is NOT OPTIONAL but is NECESSARY to the security of a free State.”
*If you want The REAL Solutions then TRUST YOURSELF to take action in A REAL PLAN: Click Here to get started and please do sign up and share this page everywhere you can post and share with everyone you know.
Sincerely, your brother Patriot to and beyond the end,