I have a most urgent, extremely critical question for all Americans and especially those who support the banning of any guns:

What would you have to be planning for you to be genuinely afraid that God-fearing, church going, law abiding, salt of the earth Americans would literally go so far as to shoot you to death over it?

“A Warning To The Left” By Vic Freeman CLICK HERE

“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, the citizens must rush tumultuously to arms in their courage and despair.” -Alexander Hamilton

Whatever your political leanings might be, let me tell you three quick things about The Silent Majority:

Firstly, The Silent Majority recently became the Non-Silent Majority and as a result have now become The Silenced Majority. 

Secondly, most of them would literally give you the shirt off their back if you needed it and that’s regardless of what color you are [hence the demonization of traditional Americans by “The Machine of Weaponized Propaganda” (aka the MSM), but that’s a whole other story involving the fact that The Dividers/Controllers want the people to be fully dependent upon them and as such they want people to hate and fear each other (and socially distance from each other) lest Marx-forbid the people help each other and not need The Dividers/Controllers.]

Thirdly, The Dividers/Controllers want to disarm every good and honest free person (including Defunding every good and honest Cop) and if you’ve never asked yourself WHY then you really need to think on that harder than you’ve ever thought on anything.

“If at any time the government forms an army, that army must never be formidable to the liberties of the people. The people must never be inferior to any army formed by government in discipline and the use of arms. Furthermore the best possible security against any army formed by the government is for the free people to hold and practice arms for the purpose of going through military exercises as often as is necessary to acquire the degrees of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia. The people at large should be properly armed and equipped; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them regularly.”

-Alexander Hamilton

AND SO WE ARRIVE AT A RED HOT BURNING QUESTION

Is breaking the law a proper response to someone else breaking the law?

Of course not you’d surely say, but that is precisely what all Gun Control advocates seek to do.

“A Warning To The Left” By Vic Freeman CLICK HERE

The Constitution is The Law of this Land.  It is not, “the law”.  It is The Law.  The word “infringe” means “to limit”.  The 2nd Amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.  It does NOT say, “shall not be infringed unless…”.  It does not say, “shall not be infringed…unless it’s a little at a time”.  Nor does it say, “shall not be infringed unless it is too black and ‘scary looking’”.

“A standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen.” -James Madison

In the correct historical context, “well-regulated” equals well equipped, well maintained, well trained, well disciplined, on the ready (this is extremely easy to confirm in countless statements of the Founders and it should be obvious to any half-intelligent adult that the Founders did not fight and win a war against government regulation because they wanted to assign the regulation of the means of war to government.  That argument is even more absurd than it is frequently used by anti-gun advocates and do not let anyone lure you down that debate hole).

Correct historical context also make extremely clear that the Founders very specifically differentiated between a militia of the people and any military which may be established and/or controlled by government.  The Founders very specifically referred to all forces such as the US Military and National Guards as a “standing army(s)”, with just a couple of the endless examples being Alexander Hamilton’s specific statement regarding an armed people being the best security against any standing army of the government, and James Madison’s statement, “A standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen.”

Finally for now, here is another thing the 2nd Amendment does not say:

“Shall not be infringed unless another person commits murder (which is already illegal), in which case we are free to break The Law in any way we see fit including the full and direct violation of the 2nd Amendment of The Law of This Land, even though the Founders of this Nation implored that a well-equipped and well-maintained militia comprised specifically of the people as specifically opposed to a specific standing army or armies which has been or is specifically established and/or run specifically by government as opposed to specifically the people is NOT OPTIONAL but is NECESSARY to the security of a free State”.

“A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice in order to serve the great body of free people to hold and practice arms for the purpose of going through military exercises as often as might be necessary to acquire the degrees of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia. The people should be properly armed and equipped; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them regularly.”

-Alexander Hamilton

*If you want The REAL Solutions then TRUST YOURSELF to take action in A REAL PLAN: Click Here to get started and please do sign up and share this page everywhere you can post and share with everyone you know.

MOLON LABE.

Sincerely, your brother Patriot to and beyond the end,

Vic Freeman

Ephesians 3:20

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BULLETin™ BLOG

One response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *